John Gear Law Office & Salem Consumer Law    503-569-7777
  • Welcome
  • Services Offered
  • Finding My Office
  • Law for Real People blog
  • Useful links

St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist applauds end to forced arbitration in financial services for consumers

5/18/2016

0 Comments

 

Banksters can't explain why, if arbitration is so good for consumers, banks force it into all contracts up front

Nothing prevents banks from giving consumers the choice to arbitrate once a dispute arises

Nicklaus: Agency wants to save consumers from the perils of fine print
By David Nicklaus | St. Louis Post-Dispatch
 
Most of us don’t read the fine print that comes in financial contracts, and the banks know it.
 
The Consumer Financial Protection Board, fortunately, wants to restore a fundamental right that many of us have unknowingly signed away. The agency wants to make sure that, if a financial institution engages in systematic wrongdoing, consumers can have their day in court.
 
A proposed CFPB rule would modify mandatory arbitration clauses that have become common in all sorts of consumer contracts, from opening a checking account to taking out a payday loan. Under the proposal, financial institutions could still require that individual disputes be handled by a private arbitrator, but they could no longer prohibit class-action suits.
 
“This is an incredibly significant step,” says Rachel Weintraub, general counsel at the Consumer Federation of America. “Consumers need redress when there’s a problem.”
 
Bankers, obviously, don’t like the proposal. Rob Nichols, president of the American Bankers Association, issued a statement saying consumers “will get less and pay more” as lenders are hit with a flood of class-action suits.
 
His prediction implies that banks will jack up the cost of credit, but that’s not what has happened in the past.
 
In 2009 and 2010, four large banks dropped their mandatory arbitration clauses as part of an antitrust settlement. The CFPB couldn’t find any evidence that they increased fees or made less credit available.
 
It’s true that arbitration is less costly than a court case, but a class action is, practically speaking, the only way to find justice for people like Gideon Homa, a New Jersey man who noticed a decade ago that his American Express rebate card wasn’t paying back as much cash as he had expected.
 
Homa, who estimated his losses at $354, learned that the arbitration filing fee could be as high as $450. An attorney filed a class-action suit and got an appellate court’s approval to go ahead. That approval was rescinded, however, after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld mandatory arbitration in another case in 2011.
 
In a report last year, the CFPB found that arbitration works overwhelmingly in financial institutions’ favor. It studied cases from 2010 and 2011 in which consumers won a total of $400,000. Companies won $2.8 million.
 
Arbitration is, then, an effective way for lenders to collect disputed debts. It’s not a very effective way for consumers to resolve small problems.
 
Opening the door to class-action suits “restores a situation in which a business can’t get away with engaging in unlawful practices that cost each consumer $5 or $30,” Washington University Law Professor Michael Greenfield says. “This is a vehicle for holding them accountable.”
 
F. Paul Bland Jr., executive director of Washington-based advocacy group Public Justice, expects a flurry of claims against payday lenders, some of which operate online and, he says, flout state laws. The CFPB says nearly all payday loan contracts have mandatory arbitration clauses.
 
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, like the bankers group, is critical of the proposed rule, saying it “will have the effect of eliminating arbitration for most consumers.”
 
That’s not necessarily true. Banks can still require individual disputes to be arbitrated, a process in which they win most of the time.
 
For consumers, meanwhile, it’s hard to see any disadvantage in the proposed rule. They should thank the CFPB for saving them from the pitfalls of fine print.
Enter your Email:
Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Author

    John Gear Law Office -
    Since 2010, a values-based Oregon law practice serving Oregon consumers, elders, employees, and nonprofits.

    Categories

    All
    Advertising
    All
    Arbitration
    Autofraud
    Bankruptcy
    Borrowing
    Class Actions
    Consumer Law
    Consumer Protection
    Consumer Protection Class Actions
    Credit
    Credit Reports
    Debt
    Debt Collection
    Elder Abuse
    Elders
    Employment
    End Of Life
    Fairness
    Fdcpa
    Foreclosures
    Fundraising
    Funeral
    Games Car Dealers Play
    Garnishments
    Great Stuff
    Health Care/Insurance
    Identity Theft
    I (heart) Liz Warren
    Insurance
    Lawyer Referral Service
    Legal Resources
    Lemon Law
    Life Planning
    Long-term Care Facilities
    Media
    Military
    Military Assistance Panel
    Modifications
    Mortgages
    N.A.O.
    Nonprofits
    Oregonadminrules
    OregonLaws.org
    Plain English
    Preparing For Departure
    Privacy
    Pro Bono
    Regulation
    Resources
    Right To Repair
    Safety
    Scam
    Scams
    Strategic Planning
    Student Loans
    Tort Reform
    Training
    Used Cars
    Veterans
    Wage Garnishment
    Wage Theft
    Warnings
    Warranties
    Watchdogs
    Workplace

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011

    RSS Feed

Picture

LAWYERLY FINE PRINT:

John Gear Law Office LLC and Salem Consumer Law.  John Gear Law Office is in Suite 208B of the Security Building in downtown Salem at 161 High St. SE, across from the Elsinore Theater, a half-block south of Marion County Courthouse, just south of State Street. There is abundant, free 3-hour on-street parking throughout downtown Salem, and three multi-story parking ramps that offer free customer parking in downtown Salem too.

Our attorneys are only licensed to practice law in Oregon. This site may be considered advertising under Oregon State Bar rules. There is no legal advice on this site so you should not interpret anything you read here as intended for your particular situation. Besides, we are not representing you and we are not your attorneys unless you have hired us by entering into a representation agreement with me. While we do want you to consider us when you seek an attorney, you should not hire any attorney based on brochures, websites, advertising, or other promotional materials.  All original content on this site is Copyright John Gear, 2010-2022.

Photos used under Creative Commons from Tony Webster, brand0con, eirikso, Fibonacci Blue, Jirka Matousek, Rd. Vortex, rcbrazier - Brazier Creative, cogdogblog, marfis75, marcoverch, GWP Photography, byzantiumbooks, Mic V., notacrime, emrank, Family Art Studio, dotpolka, respres, Mark Cummins, a little tune, Insulinde, Bill Wards Brickpile, Roger Chang, AnthonyMendezVO, jonrawlinson, Andres Rueda, Franco Folini, inman news, Pictures by Ann, ph-stop, crabchick, Jilligan86, Elvert Barnes, p.Gordon, CarbonNYC, Digital Sextant, darkpatator, Neil T, rictic, Mr. Mystery, SeanC90, richardmasoner, www.metaphoricalplatypus.com, lindsayloveshermac, Santacreu, =Nahemoth=, ReinventedWheel, LadyDragonflyCC - On Vacation, See you all soon!, Mr. T in DC, Nisha A, markcbrennan, Celestine Chua, Furryscaly, smkybear, CarbonNYC, radioedit, Don Hankins, Henrik Hovhannisyan, CoreBurn, Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, David Masters, SeeMidTN.com (aka Brent), SoulRider.222, amboo who?, robwest, Rob Ellis', floeschie, Key Foster, TechCocktail, That Other Paper, marcoverch, oskay, Muffet, rodaniel, Alan Cleaver, Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, Horia Varlan, xJasonRogersx, billaday, BasicGov, One Way Stock, mikebaird, Nevado, shalf