John Gear Law Office & Salem Consumer Law    503-569-7777
  • Welcome
  • Services Offered
  • Finding My Office
  • Law for Real People blog
  • Useful links

A good influence on me

10/27/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
0 Comments

Wells Fargo to Congress: "Thanks to you, crime DOES pay, and how!! How can we ever thank you enough? Campaign contributions, right?"

10/26/2017

0 Comments

 

America is now just like any Third-World Banana Republic -- complete with impunity for big companies, who can do anything they want to you

More from Public Justice's Paul Bland about the shameful Congressional vote to let criminal corporations bar ripped-off consumers from joining together to hold them accountable:

A nice story that sets forth how arbitration clauses that ban class actions mean that consumers don’t go to arbitration (click to hear)

The reporter had asked “gee, will this vote be a boon to the arbitration industry?”  And I was glad to see that after seeing and hearing the data, she reported that no, what the vote will mean is that consumer cases will simply disappear.   While the story is brief, it’s a very strong one that shows why the CFPB Rule was important and why the Senate vote was harmful to consumers.
 
https://www.marketplace.org/2017/10/25/business/how-restriction-class-action-lawsuits-affects-arbitration-industry
 

If you are not sure you understand just how badly Congress has sold you out and ensured that you and your family will be unable to do anything about ripoffs by big companies, here is a menu of stories.

In “Wet Kiss” for Wall Street, Congress Overturns Rules Allowing People to Sue Banks for Misconduct
Democracy Now: October 26, 2017
 
An Open Call for Trump to Veto Anti-Consumer Bill

Common Dreams: October 26, 2017
 
Frank and Raskin: Why Is Congress Hurting Consumers?

Duke Today: October 26, 2017
 
Count on a Political Backlash to the Banks’ Victory in the Senate

The New York Times: October 25, 2017
 
Republicans Just Caved to the Big Banks and Exposed Trump’s Sham Populism

The New Yorker: October 25, 2017
 
Congress Lets Consumers Down

Bloomberg: October 25, 2017
 
Why Consumers Should Care About the Dismantling of Class-Action Lawsuits

Market Watch: October 25, 2017
 
Republicans Scramble to Help Banks, Undercut Rule for Consumers

MSNBC: October 25, 2017
 
What Is the CFPB Arbitration Rule? The Senate Repealed the One Provision That Let You Hold Companies Accountable

Bustle: October 25, 2017
 
Populist Hero Mike Pence Casts Tie-Breaking Vote to Protect Banks from Lawsuits

Vanity Fair: October 25, 2017
 
Congress Just Killed a Rule That Would Have Made It Easier for Consumers to Sue Banks — Here’s Why People Are So Upset

Business Insider: October 25, 2017
 
Battle Over Fine Print: Why GOP Is Risking Consumer Ire to Support Banks

The Christian Science Monitor: October 25, 2017
 
The US Senate Is Preventing Companies Like Equifax Being Held Accountable for Major Screw-Ups

Quartz: October 25, 2017
 
It’s Good to Be a Bank in the Trump Era

Slate: October 25, 2017

0 Comments

Congress Hands Wall St. a giant "Get Out of Jail Free" card, lets banks declare open season on consumers -- Why Twain called Congress "America's only native criminal class."

10/24/2017

0 Comments

 

As the saying goes, "No matter how cynical you get, you just can't keep up"

Picture
 Paul Bland of Public Justice writes:

Late last night, 50 Senators joined Vice President Mike Pence to kill one of the most important advances in consumer rights in years.
 
By casting the tie-breaking vote to kill the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's arbitration rule - which allowed consumers to band together to sue banks, financial institutions and credit card companies - Pence showed just how much power Wall Street has amassed on Capitol Hill and on Pennsylvania Avenue. It also unmasked the alarmingly cozy relationship between GOP leaders and the bank executives who defrauded millions of consumers and exposed their most important information to Equifax hackers.

As I told one reporter this morning, "This was the Wells Fargo Immunity Act."
(click text just above for full story)

Senate Grants Immunity to Financial Industry Rip-Offs, Scams and Abuses

Statement of Robert Weissman, President, Public Citizen

Oct. 24, 2017

Contact: Angela Bradbery, abradbery@citizen.org, c. (202) 503-6768
Don Owens, dowens@citizen.org, c. (202) 617-5371
David Rosen, drosen@citizen.org, (202) 588-7742

Note: The U.S. Senate tonight voted to overturn to the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s arbitration rule.

Voting to allow banks and other financial institutions to rip off customers with impunity is a savage attack on American consumers. By voting to overturn the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) arbitration rule, Republicans in Congress are ensuring that predatory banks, payday lenders, credit card companies and other bad actors in the financial industry can steal from Main Street Americans.

As Public Citizen repeatedly has documented, the financial industry spends hundreds of millions every year on lobbying and campaign contributions to get their way in Congress. The Congressional Review Act resolution overturning the arbitration rule is a shameless payback to these interests at the expense of regular Americans.

If President Donald Trump wants to remain true to his promise to defeat cronyism, he should veto this resolution. But we’re not holding our breath, given that he has staffed his Cabinet and White House with Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street refugees.
0 Comments

Auto Dealer Add-On Products, Accessories, "Protection Plans," "Service Contracts" and Other Scams: The Stealing that comes with the Dealing

10/11/2017

1 Comment

 
Just like you should always have a shopping list and stick to the list when you go to the grocery store, you should never go to an auto dealer's lot without a list of the minimum features you need in a car, and you should stick to that list -- in other words, you should REFUSE TO ADD anything that wasn't on your list before you talked to the salesman.  If they want to sell you a car that already has more accessories or features than you were looking for, that's one thing -- but NEVER let an auto dealer talk you into buying add-ons and "protection plans" and accessories -- most are wildly overpriced nonsense, and the extra financing burden can cause you to lose the car you bought!
NCLC Report Finds Discretionary Pricing and Racial Disparities in Auto Add-on Products Sold by Car Dealers

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: OCTOBER 11, 2017 

Contacts: John Van Alst (jvanalst@nclc.org) or Jan Kruse (jkruse@nclc.org); (617-542-8010)

A Groundbreaking First Look, Based Upon a National Data Set, Reveals What Dealers Pay for Add-ons and What They Charge Customers; Advocates Urge Federal and State Action

Download the report, 19 charts, and tips for consumers at: http://bit.ly/2kmubox 
[Also available at link below]

BOSTON – Most consumers would be surprised to learn how car dealers prey on them with sucker pricing of add-on products, such as service contracts and window etching, which can add thousands of dollars to the price of a car. For example, one customer in Kentucky who paid $299 for window etching never knew that another customer at the same dealership paid $1 for the same product. But now, for the first time, NCLC unlocks the door on this hidden market in Auto Add-Ons Add Up: How Dealer Discretion Drives Excessive, Arbitrary, and Discriminatory Pricing, an analysis of a national data set of three million add-on products sold from September 2009 through June 2015.

Key findings: add-ons lead to unreasonably high and inconsistent pricing, and Hispanics pay higher prices than non-Hispanic customers for the same product.

”Our analysis demonstrates the negative consequences of opaque and inconsistent pricing of auto add-on products and the urgent need to bring transparency and consistency to this market,” said John W. Van Alst, director of the National Consumer Law Center’s Working Cars for Working Families Project and the report’s primary author. “Our findings also reveal the troubling practice of dealers charging Hispanic customers more for the same product.”

Key Findings

  • Add-on products are sold at prices far higher than dealer costs and marked up much more than similar products. For example, the average markup for service contracts was 83 percent and for window etching 325 percent, while independent auto insurance agents’ commissions average 11- to-18 percent.
  • Dealers are inconsistent in the pricing of add-on products, with even individual dealerships charging some consumers many times more than other consumers for the same product with the same dealer cost. For example, during May 2013 one dealer in Michigan charged customers from $349 to $5,000 for the same window etching product, while the dealer’s cost was $50 (chart 6).
  • This inconstant pricing for the same add-on products leads to pricing discrimination, with Hispanics charged higher markups than non-Hispanics. For example, the average percentage markup for a service contract was higher for Hispanics than non-Hispanics in 44 states. While demographics and sample sizes limited the number of states where differences were statistically significant, there were14 states for which the differences in both percentage and absolute markups were statistically significant. In each of those 14 states, Hispanics were marked up more on a percentage basis, and in all but one state. Hispanics were marked up more on an absolute basis. These states were: Massachusetts, Virginia, New York, Florida (percentage only), Kentucky, Minnesota, New Jersey, Connecticut, Missouri, Nebraska, Arizona, California, Oklahoma, and Texas (chart 13).
  • Companies that provide car financing play an important role in allowing excessive and discriminatory markups of add-on products. About 80 percent of car buyers obtain financing at the dealership. Potential creditors give dealers conditions about what sort of transactions they will accept. In order to get more business from dealers, some creditors allow higher markups for add-on products. For example, in Ohio, Ally Bank financed just 10 percent of GAP insurance where the dealer cost was $150 to $250 (chart 18) but it financed 74 percent of these same deals where the customer price exceeded $900 (chart 19).
These excessive markups on add-on products set in place a chain of negative consequences for the entire auto market. The expensive add-ons increase the price of cars and also increase the loan to value (LTV) ratio for cars. This increases the amount that consumers finance without providing any real increase to the value of the car, resulting in more negative equity and higher default rates.

"The National Consumer Law Center findings are incredibly troubling,” said Marisabel Torres, senior policy analyst at UnidosUs. “The fact that Latino consumers were charged in excess for unnecessary add-ons in the car buying process demonstrates a need for increased oversight in this sector of the market. It is entirely unacceptable that corporations use race and ethnicity as a factor in determining what they charge customers for the same product. We urge state and federal authorities to further investigate and bring enforcement actions against those found to be engaging in these discriminatory practices."

Key Recommendations

  • Dealers should be required to post the available add-ons and their prices on each car in the lot, along with the price of the car. To prevent the dealer from reintroducing non-transparency by offering discounts to some customers but not others, the prices for the add-on products must be non-negotiable.
  • To root out pricing discrimination, the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act regulations should be amended to require documentation of the customer by race or national origin for non-mortgage credit transactions, as is currently required for home mortgage transactions. If discrimination remains hidden, it will not be possible to end it.
  • State and federal enforcement authorities should investigate discrimination in pricing of add-on products and bring enforcement actions against a dealer if discrimination is shown. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Reserve Board, and state attorneys general all have authority in this area.
“These predatory practices bury consumers deep in debt before they even leave the lot, and trap people in older, less-safe, higher-polluting vehicles,” said Rosemary Shahan, president of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety. “For the amount of money millions of consumers are being charged for worthless add-ons, they could buy a much newer, safer, more fuel-efficient car. For the sake of consumers, their families, their communities, and the environment, state attorneys general, as well as the CFPB, FTC, and Federal Reserve need to step up their game and put a stop to the discrimination and abuse.”

2017-10-11_nclc_report-auto-add-on.pdf
File Size: 678 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

1 Comment

ConsumerAffairs.com: Thinking of a CarMax Deal?  Maybe MAX Trouble

10/11/2017

0 Comments

 
CarMax sells cars under recall without repairing the problem, report warns

Over one-in-four cars sold by CarMax were found to have safety defects

When shoppers search for used vehicles on CarMax.com, they are greeted with a sleek website, the promise of a “Carmax Quality” certification on the entire inventory, and upfront pricing -- no haggling necessary or allowed.

It’s the exact opposite of what a shopper gets when they visit a run-down used car lot. But a new study suggests that the quality of CarMax Quality Certified cars is about the same as vehicles at that used car lot, and the company’s “no-haggle” policy means that consumers could be paying more for a car with open recalls and safety issues, according to a coalition of consumer safety groups. 

Make sure you check for open recalls on ANY used car you are thinking of buying, BEFORE you buy:
https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls

Full report downloadable below
carmax_cars-found_masspirg_report_-sept28-2017.pdf
File Size: 2250 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

Forced Arbitration is a Racket and U.S. Consumers are the Victims

10/2/2017

0 Comments

 
Forced arbitration seems to be significantly more lucrative for Wells Fargo than other financial institutions. As one might suspect based on the CFPB data, Wells Fargo was awarded more money in arbitration than it was ordered to pay consumers between 2009 and the first half of 2017, despite creating 3.5 million fraudulent accounts during that same period. The average consumer that arbitrated with Wells Fargo was ordered to pay the bank nearly $11,000.10
A mean of $10,826 was awarded to the bank across all publicly available claims.


In contrast, the CFPB study found that class action lawsuits return at least $440 million, after deducting all attorneys’ fees and court costs, to 6.8 million consumers in an average year.11 Thus, banning consumer class actions lets financial institutions keep hundreds of millions of dollars that would otherwise go back to harmed consumers—and there is little doubt that Wells Fargo has harmed huge numbers of consumers in recent years.

Opponents of the CFPB’s arbitration rule additionally claim that allowing consumers to join together in court will increase consumer costs and decrease available credit. Most recently, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) claimed restoring consumers’ right to join together in court could cause interest rates to rise as much as 25 percent.12

However, examining the OCC’s study, it appears the agency merely duplicated the conclusion reached by the CFPB and based its 25 percent estimate solely on results it admits are “statistically insignificant at the 95 percent (and 90 percent) confidence level.”13 In its 2015 study, the CFPB considered this same data and accurately assessed that there was no “statistically significant evidence of an increase in prices among those companies that dropped their arbitration clauses.”14


Great letter from the Economic Policy Institute to the Senate Banking Committee, which is considering whether to override the proposed ban on forced arbitration clauses in consumer finance contracts that prohibit consumers from bringing  class action suits against institutions that practice wholesale fraud and deception, such as Wells Fargo.

Click here to read it all.

0 Comments

    RSS Feed

    Author

    John Gear Law Office -
    Since 2010, a values-based Oregon law practice serving Oregon consumers, elders, employees, and nonprofits.

    Categories

    All
    Advertising
    All
    Arbitration
    Autofraud
    Bankruptcy
    Borrowing
    Class Actions
    Consumer Law
    Consumer Protection
    Consumer Protection Class Actions
    Credit
    Credit Reports
    Debt
    Debt Collection
    Elder Abuse
    Elders
    Employment
    End Of Life
    Fairness
    Fdcpa
    Foreclosures
    Fundraising
    Funeral
    Games Car Dealers Play
    Garnishments
    Great Stuff
    Health Care/Insurance
    Identity Theft
    I (heart) Liz Warren
    Insurance
    Lawyer Referral Service
    Legal Resources
    Lemon Law
    Life Planning
    Long-term Care Facilities
    Media
    Military
    Military Assistance Panel
    Modifications
    Mortgages
    N.A.O.
    Nonprofits
    Oregonadminrules
    OregonLaws.org
    Plain English
    Preparing For Departure
    Privacy
    Pro Bono
    Regulation
    Resources
    Right To Repair
    Safety
    Scam
    Scams
    Strategic Planning
    Student Loans
    Tort Reform
    Training
    Used Cars
    Veterans
    Wage Garnishment
    Wage Theft
    Warnings
    Warranties
    Watchdogs
    Workplace

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011

    RSS Feed

Picture

LAWYERLY FINE PRINT:

John Gear Law Office LLC and Salem Consumer Law.  John Gear Law Office is in Suite 208B of the Security Building in downtown Salem at 161 High St. SE, across from the Elsinore Theater, a half-block south of Marion County Courthouse, just south of State Street. There is abundant, free 3-hour on-street parking throughout downtown Salem, and three multi-story parking ramps that offer free customer parking in downtown Salem too.

Our attorneys are only licensed to practice law in Oregon. This site may be considered advertising under Oregon State Bar rules. There is no legal advice on this site so you should not interpret anything you read here as intended for your particular situation. Besides, we are not representing you and we are not your attorneys unless you have hired us by entering into a representation agreement with me. While we do want you to consider us when you seek an attorney, you should not hire any attorney based on brochures, websites, advertising, or other promotional materials.  All original content on this site is Copyright John Gear, 2010-2022.

Photos used under Creative Commons from Tony Webster, brand0con, eirikso, Fibonacci Blue, Jirka Matousek, Rd. Vortex, rcbrazier - Brazier Creative, cogdogblog, marfis75, marcoverch, GWP Photography, byzantiumbooks, Mic V., notacrime, emrank, Family Art Studio, dotpolka, respres, Mark Cummins, a little tune, Insulinde, Bill Wards Brickpile, Roger Chang, AnthonyMendezVO, jonrawlinson, Andres Rueda, Franco Folini, inman news, Pictures by Ann, ph-stop, crabchick, Jilligan86, Elvert Barnes, p.Gordon, CarbonNYC, Digital Sextant, darkpatator, Neil T, rictic, Mr. Mystery, SeanC90, richardmasoner, www.metaphoricalplatypus.com, lindsayloveshermac, Santacreu, =Nahemoth=, ReinventedWheel, LadyDragonflyCC - On Vacation, See you all soon!, Mr. T in DC, Nisha A, markcbrennan, Celestine Chua, Furryscaly, smkybear, CarbonNYC, radioedit, Don Hankins, Henrik Hovhannisyan, CoreBurn, Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, David Masters, SeeMidTN.com (aka Brent), SoulRider.222, amboo who?, robwest, Rob Ellis', floeschie, Key Foster, TechCocktail, That Other Paper, marcoverch, oskay, Muffet, rodaniel, Alan Cleaver, Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, Horia Varlan, xJasonRogersx, billaday, BasicGov, One Way Stock, mikebaird, Nevado, shalf